Saturday, March 14, 2015

Screen Junkies Honest Trailers

Puts the LMAO in ROTFLMAO...


I haven't had this much fun with the small screen since the first time I watched Archer.  Honest Trailers says all the things you wish you'd said first about the overrated dreck at your favorite overpriced popcorn and soda dispensary.

Friday, February 20, 2015

A Visit To Peregrine Book Company...

Is always in order...


The folks are in town and they presented me some belated holiday cash, which I promptly spent at my favorite independently owned and operated local bookstore. Peregrine Book Company is located on 219A North Cortez in Prescott, Arizona.

Kim Stanley Robinson is the renowned author of the Mars Trilogy.

Never read any Neil Gaiman but I hear good things.

Jennifer Michael Hecht is a poet, author, and thinker.

Philosopher Julian Baggini has been a speaker on Unbelievable, one of my favorite podcasts.

I heard Yuval Noah Harari talking about his book, Sapiens, on Ideas: With Paul Kennedy.

Good reading awaits me in the weeks to come.

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Gramma Kay's Bucket List

Is one item shorter...


"I want to ride in a helicopter over the Grand Canyon. Will you come with me?" asked my sainted mother.

How could I say no?

So on Sunday, February 15th, 2015, Mom and I boarded our "once-in-a-lifetime" helicopter ride over the Grand Canyon. We flew with Papillon Grand Canyon Helicopters. They're an extremely efficient and confidence-inspiring outfit that seem to go out of their way to hire First Peoples. I recommend them highly.

The helicopter was a Eurocopter EC130. It was very comfortable and the view from the front seat  was awesome! Our Canadian acquaintences (two farming couples from Ottawa, eh!) in the back seat seemed very impressed as well.

Our pilot's name was Logan. He looked to be about 18 years old, but he has over 2000 hrs in rotors and has been flying commercial for four years (at Papillon for two). He trained and was an instructor pilot at Guidance Aviation, here in Prescott, rather than at Embry-Riddle.

The flight was mostly level, with one 1,000 foot climb at the North Rim, and a couple banking turns. Logan only warned us not to fall out on one of them.

My pictures from the helicopter are no better than those you've seen a thousand times. The treat was to be over the canyon...

The very best part of the whole day was listening to my 78 year mother giggle like a giddy school girl about her flight.

I love being her son...

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

The Outsider Test of Faith...Meh

Again with the religion...


Justin Brierly and Unbelievable gave the microphone to David Marshall and John Loftus these last two weekends. Their dialogue was contentious and at times unseemly. My response to Part One was as follows:


I must say it was no great shock to hear that a Christian apologist believes that Christianity not only passes "The Outsider Test of Faith," but also defeats all contenders. 
I was surprised, however, to hear that only Islam and Marxism were spread by the sword. The notion that Christianity was not introduced by and then defended with force is silly on its face. For much of its history The Church has been the power behind, a partner in, or the direct beneficiary of European imperialism and colonialism. The history of Western civilization is rife with religious warfare. Some of Christianity's greatest hits include the Crusades, the Reconquista, and the European Wars of Religion (a century of Christians killing Christians over what sort of Christian everyone should be). The New World encountered Christianity at the hands of the Conquistadors and their priests. With regard to apostasy, before anyone smugly compares the compassion of Christianity with the brutality of Islam, he should remember that except for the past couple centuries renouncing one's Christianity, or professing the wrong version of it, was also a potentially deadly undertaking. No, The Church has used force - social, economic, political, and military - to advance and protect its interests, and in several ways it still does.

Now for a gripe. Despite Justin's best efforts neither of his guests did much to help Unbelievable meet its routinely high standards. John Loftus grumbled arrogantly and mumbled dismissively while David Marshall treated us to a symphony of distractions in the background of his call. I hope they'll each bring their "A" games for next week's episode.

My riposte to Part Deux read thus:

During a somewhat more congenial Part Two, Mr. Marshall spoke of finding the God of Christianity in other religions and holy places around the world. This is not surprising for several reasons, none of which necessarily have anything to do with the truth of Christianity’s claims.

Symbolic communication in the form of music, dance, art, language, and religion appear to have emerged in humans ~80,000 years ago. It should be no surprise if we find that the archetypes of all our human stories, including those about the gods, have a common origin. I suspect we will disagree as to whether we recorded stories the gods told us or the myths we invented about them.

Regardless whether God or nature created the “God-shaped hole” in our psyche, mankind has for some ten millennia been building places that evoke a strong emotional response. We have been seeking spectacular vistas for much longer. Many pursue peak experiences that provide a sense of connection with the divine. Our attraction to such stimuli may be the result of our particular sensory apparatus, our very special cognitive processes, or our needs as a social animal.

Christians have a knack for reading their story into books written by others, most notably the Hebrew Bible. Those who wish to strongly believe will find evidence in coincidence. When we fall prey to confirmation bias and motivated reasoning we count the hits but forget the misses, and credit ideas that support our opinions and disregard the rest.
Depending on one’s background, the Christian story can make interesting – even novel – literature. But if one hopes to believe the Christian Bible from cover to cover he best wear all the right blinders, select the correct lenses, apply the proper filters, and carefully choose the company he keeps. The theist has a simpler argument, so long as he does not bind himself to any tradition’s particulars. The atheist (at least the so-called “soft” variety) has the least to prove, having asked only for evidence that supports an alternative to the null hypothesis.

Finally, I’ll note that over the centuries many of Mr. Marshall’s coreligionists have not been nearly as ecumenical in their outlook and did their level best to extirpate competing religions. 
These have been two very challenging episodes (even if they were recorded at the same time). While I understand what Mr. Loftus is trying to show the faithful with his OTF, I find his irascible interpersonal style (more pronounced on-line) and his shorthand dismissal of arguments off-putting. While I have a sense of what Mr. Marshall is trying to say, his certitude remains unconvincing to this outsider.

Still much to and fro in the comments section for each episode. If your cat has been washed, the gutters mucked out, and your comic books sorted I can recommend the dialogue to you, I guess...



Image credit: "The Execution of the Inca" from The Adventures of Pizarro by George Towle.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Other Interpretations

The Binding of Isaac is one of the better known creepy stories in the Old Testament...


Notwithstanding the Muslim version, in which Ishmael (Abraham's actual first born son) was to be sacrificed, are there other interpretations? First, the passage in question:


Genesis 22:1-14
22 And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am.
2 And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.
3 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and saddled his ass, and took two of his young men with him, and Isaac his son, and clave the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up, and went unto the place of which God had told him.
4 Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off.
5 And Abraham said unto his young men, Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you.
6 And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac his son; and he took the fire in his hand, and a knife; and they went both of them together.
7 And Isaac spake unto Abraham his father, and said, My father: and he said, Here am I, my son. And he said, Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?
8 And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.
9 And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.
10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.
11 And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I.
12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.
13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son.
14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.

There are a variety of ways to think about this nasty little story:

#1 God was testing Abraham.  Abraham passed. Most of the ink spilled over the millennia has been in favor of this, the usual interpretation.  God still comes across as a bit of a thug, especially if he knew how it was all going to play out.

#2 Abraham was also testing God. He passed. This was spelled out quite nicely in Dan Simmons' brilliant The Fall of Hyperion (Book Four of the Hyperion Cantos - read the entire series for other excellent examples of theological exegesis).

#3 An angel of the Lord stayed Abraham's hand, not God. A minority view to be sure, but an intriguing one.  Old Testament YHWH was talked out of some bad ideas from time to time, even by men, even by Abraham himself.  Is it so much to think that an angel or two intervened between God and man in the years since Eden?  While we're musing along those lines, perhaps there's more to the rebellion of the angels than the victor cares to tell...

#4 Abraham disobeyed and refused to sacrifice Isaac, and lied about God staying his hand. This would have been a very interesting twist in the story line. The concept of a man being too humane to follow God's instructions is about the only good bit in Darren Aronofsky's Noah (sorry if that was a spoiler).

#5 Abraham actually killed Isaac (there was a time when first fruits of all kinds were offered to the deity), but later redactors cleaned up the story as that practice fell into disrepute.

Like I said, it's probably the best know creepy story in the Bible, but not the creepiest...